จดหมายข่าว มกราคม 2553

แพทยสภา

ศูนย์การศึกษาต่อเนื่องฯ

ราชวิทยาลัยอายุรแพทย์ฯ
     ดูเว็บไซต์ทั้งหมด
 

Antibacterial Activity of Carbapenem-Based Combinations Againts Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

161

Pintip Pongpech PhD*, Suparak Amornnopparattanakul MSc**, Sakulthip Panapakdee MSc**, Siriporn Fungwithaya MSc**, Penphun Nannha MSc*, Chertsak Dhiraputra MD***, Amorn Leelarasamee MD****

* Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
** Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
*** Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
**** Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract


Background: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii are increasingly encountered and frequently susceptible only to colistin with their MIC values close to resistance breakpoint. Antibacterial activity of two carbapenem-based combinations were explored in order to overcome the bacterial resistance.
Material and Method: Thirty clinical isolates of MDR A. baumannii were employed to assess in vitro antibacterial activity of two carbapenem-based regimens. Imipenem combined with colistin and meropenem combined with colistin and sulbactam were the first and second regimens, respectively. All isolates were resistant to imipenem (MIC range: 8-128 mg/ml) and meropenem (MIC range: 64-256 mg/ml) but still susceptible to colistin (MIC range: 0.5-2 mg/ml). The MIC range of sulbactam was 4-64 mg/ml. None of the isolates produced metallo-b-lactamase.
Results: Synergistic antibacterial effect of imipenem combined with colistin was observed against 100 percent of A. baumannii isolates by the checkerboard microdilution panel method. In a subsequent time kill study, the most active concentration of this regimen was the combination of imipenem at the fixed concentration of 32 mg/ml and colistin at the 1/4 of the MIC values of each isolate that exerted significantly higher bactericidal activity than imipenem at 32 mg/ml alone and colistin alone at the 1/4 of the MIC values. The scanning electron micrographs demonstrated major cell morphological change and cell wall destruction after 2-hour exposure to this combination. The triple combinations of meropenem, sulbactam and colistin showed synergy against 96.7 percent of MDR A. baumannii while double combinations of either meropenem and sulbactam, meropenem and colistin, and sulbactam and colistin showed synergy effects of 70%, 73.3% and 53.3%, respectively. The time kill study using ten isolates also showed better killing effect by the triple combination than any of the double combinations.
Conclusion: Antibacterial activity against MDR A. baumannii of imipenem plus colistin was superior over any single of the two agents. The addition of sulbactam to meropenem and colistin may further improve their antibacterial activity. The double or triple carbapenem-based combinations offer promising alternatives in the treatment of infections due to MDR A. baumannii.


Keyword : Acinetobacter baumannii, Imipenem, Meropenem, Colistin, Sulbactam, Antimicrobial combination, Multidrug-resistance, Synergy



Download Full Paper
  Vol93_No.2_161_3879.pdf  [ 215.37 Kb]
 
   
Untitled Document